Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholar Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 49–59. The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 36–47 doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.17.1.36 First citation in article Link, Google ScholarĬ. Parents’ judgments and students’ self-judgments of empathy: The structure of empathy and agreement of judgments based on the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĬ. Testing unidimensionality in polytomous Rasch models. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Research on PISA: Research outcomes of the PISA research conference 2009 (pp. Linking PISA competencies over three cycles – Results from Germany research on PISA. Unidimensionality in the Rasch model: How to detect and interpret. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, Hove, UK: Psychology Press First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholar Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. First citation in article Google Scholarĭ. Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholarī. A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 257–265. Latent structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in methadone maintenance patients. The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale”. Our results provide direct suggestions (e.g., theoretically explainable sub-dimensions) for further developments of the IRI to overcome this limitation.ĭ. It demonstrates that these analyses were not warranted by the psychometric quality of the questionnaire. Our study provides important information on the psychometric qualities of the IRI that has been repeatedly used to assess, for example, group differences. For the subscale personal distress, no model fit could be achieved. The subscales perspective taking and fantasy consisted of two theoretically explainable sub-dimensions. The results showed model fit only for the subscale empathic concern. Only in such a case, further analyses based on the raw-scores are accurate and valid. If this model fits the data, the raw-scores are fair measures of the latent construct. We investigated the psychometric properties of the German version using the partial credit model. The interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) is a widely used personality questionnaire for measuring empathy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |